•Afam Osigwe (SAN)
An immediate past President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Mazi Afam Osigwe (SAN) has said that alleged lack of independence of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), difficult rules of evidence and weak electoral laws are undermining elections conducted in Nigeria.
Mazi Adam Osigwe also declared that Nigerian courts have gradually usurped the statutory power of citizens in determining their elected representatives through controversial legal technicalities, even as he added that the nation’s democracy is being severely undermined by procedural bottlenecks and systemic corruption.
Osigwe who spoke at the All Nigeria Editors’ Conference of the Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE) in Enugu today, with the theme, “The ballot, the media and the task of keeping democracy alive”, also identified weak enforcement procedures as responsible for flagrant disobedience to court judgements.
He stated that courts had increasingly become involved in determining electoral outcomes, raising questions about whether elections were being decided by voters or judges, reports The Guardian.
He described the development as the “judicialisation of the electoral process”, blaming it partly on the difficulty of proving electoral malpractice.
Osigwe said Nigeria had one of the highest numbers of election petitions because courts were frequently called upon to determine who won elections.
He said: “The courts have gradually and increasingly usurped the role of the voters in determining the representatives of the people. And I couldn’t have agreed with him more.”
The former NBA president also questioned the effectiveness of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV), saying technologies introduced to strengthen elections had created fresh legal and evidentiary challenges.
According to him, petitioners challenging a state-wide election could be required to produce BVAS devices from every polling unit, despite the limited time allowed for election petitions.
“So if you’re challenging state-wide election, and an issue concerns BVAS from every polling unit, you must physically go and carry the BVAS from every polling unit. And yet the court is not a bit hesitant to set time limits,” he said.
Osigwe said the situation defeated the purpose of using technology to make elections and election disputes easier to resolve.
He also criticised the treatment of evidence obtained through subpoenas, particularly in petitions arising from the 2023 general elections.
He said petitioners were required to file their evidence within 21 days, making documents or testimony obtained later through subpoenas inadmissible.
“Why do we call it a subpoena? Why didn’t they say they are your witnesses?” he asked, referring to the presidential election petitions filed by Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi.
Osigwe said the interpretation had weakened the usefulness of subpoenas, especially where petitioners needed documents in the custody of INEC or other public institutions.
On IReV, he said the portal should be given greater evidentiary recognition, even if it was not treated as the primary evidence of an election.
“I’m not saying it should be the primary evidence, but first of all, some recognition should be given to it,” he said.
He also expressed concern over a proposed change to the electoral framework which, according to him, would prevent non-compliance with INEC regulations and guidelines from constituting grounds for challenging an election.
He warned that such a provision could encourage politicians to focus only on securing declarations, regardless of whether the process complied with the law.
Osigwe said the popular phrase, “Go to court,” had acquired a negative meaning because of public suspicion about the electoral justice system.
He said some politicians used it in a manner suggesting that they already knew the outcome of any legal challenge.
On INEC’s independence, Osigwe said the process of appointing members of the commission remained a major concern.
He also questioned the use of ad-hoc electoral officers, including academics, alleging that some officials recruited for election duties had later faced criminal proceedings.
According to him, voter turnout would continue to decline if Nigerians believed that their votes could be manipulated between polling units and collation centres.
He said violence, ethnic profiling, vote buying and the use of thugs had further weakened confidence in elections.
Osigwe also criticised the conduct of some State Independent Electoral Commissions, saying ruling parties often recorded overwhelming victories in local government elections, thereby reinforcing the perception that electoral bodies were not independent.
He linked the crisis to what he described as a failure of leadership, saying the problem extended beyond the presidency and included governors, local government chairmen, political parties and leaders in homes and organisations.
He urged editors and journalists to continue to scrutinise INEC, the courts and political actors, saying the media had a crucial role in ensuring that votes cast by Nigerians translated into legitimate political mandates.
Answering questions on why judgements are no longe justice, he stated that it was a perception thing, noting that are wonderful judgements from the courts that have strengthened the polity.
He also cautioned against what he described as “Lawyers being used as tools in the hands of the clients”, saying it negates the course of justice and overburdens the courts.
