•Segun Olowookere
The Osun State Judiciary has condemned mischief-makers for spreading false information regarding the case of Segun Olowookere and Sunday Morakinyo, who were wrongly reported to have been sentenced to death for stealing a fowl.
The judiciary criticised those responsible for the misleading claims, accusing them of intellectual bankruptcy, reports The Nation.
Recall that the controversy began when the parents of Segun Olowookere, during a podcast interview, claimed their son had been sentenced to death for stealing a fowl.
This prompted Governor Ademola Adeleke to order an investigation into the matter, with plans to release the convict from prison.
In a statement issued by the Judiciary, signed by the Registrar, F.I. Omisade, on December 20, 2024, it was emphasised that “An educated person does not need to be a lawyer to understand that someone cannot be sentenced to death for stealing a fowl—nor for stealing even one billion naira—unless they were armed during the commission of the crime.”
“A person charged with armed robbery is mandatorily sentenced by the trial judge to death by hanging once the defendant or accused person is proved and adjudged to be armed with a lethal weapon at the time of committing the offence.”
He noted that Segun and Sunday were going about Oyan town and its neighbourhood robbing innocent and unsuspecting people at gunpoint, disclosing that “luck ran out on them in April 2010 when they were caught in action while robbing poultry. Arms were recovered from them. They also confessed to committing several armed robberies.”
He stated that they were found guilty as the judge imposed the death sentence mandatorily prescribed by law.
Omisade also debunked claims that the boys were underage when they were tried before the court, noting that the confessional statements of the two convicts reflected that they were 19 and 18 years of age when they committed the crime.
“It is, therefore, a desperate design to whip up undeserved sentiment. The entire scenario woven around this case has been skewed to malign the personality of the trial judge and denigrate the Osun State High Court as an institution.
“The trial judge, in His Lordship’s characteristic magnanimity, large heart, and fatherly disposition, did what the law prescribed and went further to recommend them for the mercy of the governor.”
