•Akpabio and Natasha
The Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and the Senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, have continued exchanging words over the crisis at the Senate triggered by the suspension of the Kogi lawmaker.
While Akpabio accused Akpoti-Uduaghan of traumatising others with unfounded allegations, the Kogi lawmaker said she was not the first to accuse the Senate President of sexual harassment, urging him to submit to an investigation, reports Sunday PUNCH.
The disagreement between the two lawmakers became a public spectacle two weeks ago when, during plenary, Akpoti-Uduaghan rejected the relocation of her seat.
She also told the Senate President that she was not scared of him.
Although Akpabio tried to downplay the severity of the matter, the Kogi lawmaker featured in a live television programme the next morning where she accused him of sexual harassment.
Last week, the Senate suspended Akpoti-Uduaghan for six months following a recommendation by its Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions.
She was suspended for six months as many rights groups and activists condemned the decision and called for fair hearing.
Natasha fond of traumatic, “useless” allegations – Akpabio
Akpabio, at an event to commemorate the International Women’s Day, claimed to be Akpoti-Uduaghan’s victim.
He noted that previous allegations of sexual harassment levelled against others by the senator had turned out to be false.
He said, “It was only yesterday I realised that what we are talking about only happened when there was a change of seat. That was when all hell was let loose and all sorts of allegations came up. Only after the change of seat and change of committee, which my senators know happens from time to time.
“This was said to have happened on the 8th of December, a day before my birthday, which was celebrated in the stadium in 2023. So, from the 8th of December 2023, I never heard, my wife never heard, no Nigerian ever heard, even the husband never heard any issue of sexual harassment until her committee was changed, and her seat was changed.
“Have you ever wondered about the trauma caused by that same woman on the other people she has accused in the past? None has been proved so far. Do you even wonder the trauma this caused to the 10th Senate and the image of the Senate with all these useless allegations? I have refrained from making a statement.
“Look at these beautiful women. They have come across me so many times. Have I ever harassed any one of you? Or is the person thinking that you are not beautiful?”
Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan fires back
Natasha dismissed the claims by the Senate President, insisting that a formal investigation was necessary to establish the truth.
The senator, while speaking through her lawyer, Victor Giwa, also pointed out that a similar allegation of sexual harassment was made against Akpabio by a former Managing Director of the Niger Delta Development Commission, Joy Nunieh.
“If Akpabio makes such a statement, the question anybody will ask is why are there two allegations of sexual harassment against him? Joy Nunieh made the same allegation, and now it is Natasha. Akpabio should subject himself to investigation,” he stated.
Giwa said Akpabio was attempting to manipulate Senate proceedings to avoid scrutiny.
He further alleged that Akpabio was using his position to victimise the lawmaker following her refusal to yield to his advances.
“Is it true that Natasha has been prevented from participating in international engagements involving senators? Is it true that she has been forced to use her funds for official trips while others have their expenses covered? These are hard facts that need to be addressed,” he said.
Giwa also maintained that his client would not back down from her legal battle against the Senate President despite efforts from various stakeholders, including the Minister of Women Affairs and Social Welfare, Imaan Suleiman.
“She welcomes the involvement of the Women Affairs Minister and others who are trying to mediate. A meeting between them is scheduled for next week,” he said.
Why we suspended Kogi lawmaker – Senate
The Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, yesterday, clarified that Akpoti-Uduaghan was suspended for gross misconduct and not for the sexual harassment allegation she levelled against Akpabio.
Bamidele, in a statement, said there were deliberate false narratives being circulated by some media organisations on the matter.
He said, “If Senator Uduaghan had strictly followed our guiding principles, the Senate would have treated her petition based on merit in line with its practice. But she never obeyed the established practices of the institution where she was serving.”
He further said the Kogi lawmaker’s suspension was a decision of the committee of the whole Senate following the submission of a report by the chairman, Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions, Senator Neda Imaseun.
“The report found her guilty of violating sections 6.1 and 6.2 of the Senate Rules and recommended her immediate suspension.
“The disciplinary action was a response to her repeated violations of legislative decorum, including: One, for refusing to sit in her assigned seat during plenary on 25th February 2025, despite multiple pleas from the Minority Leader and other ranking Senators—an act of open defiance and disorderly conduct.
“Two, for speaking without being recognised by the presiding officer in clear violation of parliamentary practices and procedures on 25th February 2025.
“Three, for engaging in unruly and disruptive behaviour, obstructing the orderly conduct of Senate proceedings.
“For making abusive and disrespectful remarks against the leadership of the Senate.
“Five, defying and refusing to comply with the summons of the Senate Committee on Ethics and Privileges mandated to investigate cases of misconduct.”
Bamidele urged the public and the media to disregard false reports suggesting otherwise and to always seek the truth before spreading politically motivated narratives.
Falana threatens senators
In a related development, the Director of Women Empowerment and Legal Aid, Mrs Funmi Falana SAN, described the suspension of the senator as a “disgraceful display of power”.
Falana, in a statement yesterday, threatened to drag members of the Senate who are lawyers before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee if the suspension was not reversed.
The wife of human rights activist, Femi Falana, SAN, argued that the Senate exhibited gross impunity by suspending Akpoti-Uduaghan without fair hearing.
Mrs Falana said, “By suspending Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan without affording her the opportunity to substantiate the allegation of sexual abuse levelled against the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, the Senate violated her fundamental right to fair hearing guaranteed by section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999.
“Having sworn to comply with the provisions of the Constitution without fear or favour, the gross impunity exhibited by the senators cannot be justified. The suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan by the Senate is a disgraceful display of power.
“On two occasions the Senate had suspended two of its members – Senator Ovie Omo-Agege and Senator Ali Ndume. On both occasions, the Federal High Court declared the suspensions illegal and unconstitutional.
“In the case of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the Federal High Court had restrained the Senate Committee from hearing the complaint against her pending the determination of the motion on notice.
“Since the suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan cannot be justified under the Constitution and the Rules of the Senate, the Senate is advised to lift the suspension without any delay. Otherwise, the members of the Senate who are lawyers will be dragged to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee by the Women Empowerment and Legal Aid.”
Reps seek review of suspension process
Meanwhile, the House of Representatives is considering a bill to amend the 1999 Constitution to provide a review of the processes for suspending federal lawmakers.
According to a member of the House of Representatives, Mansur Soro, the Senate Standing Rules are not superior to the 1999 constitution.
Soro, a member of the Peoples Democratic Party representing Darazo/Gnajuwa Federal Constituency, Bauchi State, is the sponsor of a bill for an Act to alter the 1999 constitution to “Regulate the process of suspending a member of the National Assembly from legislative duties and for a related matter,” currently before the Committee on Constitution Review.
A copy of the bill, obtained by our correspondent, showed that the proposed legislation seeks an alternation of Section 60 of the Constitution with the introduction of sub-section 2.
Section 60 of the Principal Act is altered to introduce a new sub-section 2 which shall read thus, “Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorising the Senate or the House of Representatives to suspend its member(s) except through a recommendation by its committee responsible for ethics and privileges and approved by signatures of two-fourth majority of the members of that House.”
Speaking with our correspondent, the federal lawmaker said, “This bill seeks to alter the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 to regulate the process of suspending a member of the National Assembly.
“This is to mitigate abuse of regulations and procedures in suspending a duly elected member of the National Assembly, to ensure that the representation and voice of all senatorial districts and federal constituencies are sustained in both houses of the National Assembly.”
Asked what the Red Chamber should do in the light of the controversy generated by the Natasha/Akpabio feud, the Bauchi lawmaker said, “The Senate should obey the court, recall Senator Natasha and allow the court to decide the matter. The Constitution created the office. Rules can’t take precedence over a constitutional provision, adding that, “The people of Kogi Central Senatorial District should not be punished for the fight of two senators. Their voice and representation at the senate chamber should be restored.”
In light of the tension generated by the development, Soro called for a review of the process of the appointment of the chairman and members of the Ethics and Privileges Committee in both chambers of the National Assembly, saying, “You don’t expect the chairmen to do much against the person who appointed them.”
