•A network subscriber
The return of airtime lending services on MTN has come as a major relief to millions of subscribers who depended on the facility during the regulatory dispute that disrupted emergency airtime and data advances across Nigeria.
For many users, the restoration of the service is more than the return of a convenience. It marks the return of a critical lifeline that helped them stay connected to work, financial services and loved ones during emergencies, reports The Guardian.
Among those welcoming the development is Farouk Rabiu, an employee with a Lagos based firm, whose experience during the suspension underscores the importance of the service to millions of Nigerians.
“The first time I realised I could no longer borrow credit on Glo and MTN came as a big surprise,” Rabiu said.
Adding, “I was devastated because, after exhausting my data, I was hoping to borrow credit to access my bank account. Instead, it was a major disappointment.”
Reflecting on the restoration of the service, the employee said: “I missed having that option.”
Although he acknowledged that the charges associated with airtime borrowing could sometimes be high, he maintained that the service remained indispensable.
“They do save you from some unnecessary embarrassment. I missed having that option,” Rabiu stressed.
His experience mirrors the concerns earlier raised by the Association of Licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigeria (ALTON), which argued that the suspension affected a service that had become critical economic infrastructure for millions of Nigerians.
According to ALTON Chairman, Gbenga Adebayo, the disruption demonstrated that airtime credit had evolved beyond a simple telecommunications offering.
“What this episode demonstrated is that airtime credit is not a financial product in the way regulators initially characterised it. It is economic infrastructure that approximately 40 million people use regularly, with the vast majority of them at the base of the economy,” Adebayo said.
ALTON estimated that about 40 million subscribers were affected by the disruption, warning that the dispute threatened an industry valued at between ₦300 billion and ₦400 billion annually while posing risks to consumer welfare, investor confidence and regulatory certainty.
The Wireless Application Service Providers Association of Nigeria (WASPAN), which challenged aspects of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission’s (FCCPC) regulations in court, also defended the service, saying its legal action was intended to protect licensed Nigerian operators and millions of subscribers who rely on airtime and data advances.
According to the association, airtime lending has become an essential support mechanism for traders, artisans, small business owners and other Nigerians who often lack access to conventional credit facilities.
The FCCPC, however, maintained that its intervention was motivated by consumer protection concerns.
The Commission classified airtime and data advances as a form of consumer lending under its Digital, Electronic, Online or Non-Traditional Consumer Lending Regulations, arguing that stronger regulatory oversight was necessary to improve transparency and accountability in the digital credit market.
Following court orders and growing industry opposition, the Commission suspended enforcement of the regulations pending the determination of the substantive suit.
FCCPC Director of Corporate Affairs, Ondaje Ijagwu, said the Commission took the decision in obedience to the rule of law while continuing to pursue its legal arguments before the court.
For subscribers like Rabiu, however, the legal battle has always been secondary to the practical value of the service.
For them, airtime lending often makes the difference between remaining connected or being cut off from banking services, work opportunities, family communication and emergency support.
With MTN’s restoration of the service – after major competitors Airtel and Glo has taken the lead for weeks – millions of users are once again able to access an option many have come to regard as an essential safety net in Nigeria’s increasingly difficult economic environment, even as the broader legal dispute over regulation and jurisdiction continues before the courts.
